Classification
 Nomenclature
Scientific Name:
Fissidens taylorii var. sainsburyanus J.E.Beever, Fl. New Zealand Mosses 8, 1, 41, pl. 26 (2014)
Synonymy:
  • Sainsburia novae-zealandiae Dixon, Bryologist 44: 40 (1941)
  • Fissidens taylorii var. sainsburiana Allison, Trans. Roy. Soc. New Zealand 88: 9 (1960) nom. inval.
Holotype: New Zealand, Hawkes Bay, Whakakī Lagoon, near Wairoa, 23 July 1939, G.O.K. Sainsbury 960, BM! Isotype: WELT!
  • = Fissidens brevifolius Hook.f. & Wilson in Wilson, Bot. Antarct. Voy. II (Fl. Nov.-Zel.) Part II, 61 (1854)
Holotype: N.Z., North Island, 1850, Colenso, BM-Wilson!
Etymology:
The varietal epithet honours G.O.K. Sainsbury, the collector of the holotype, who, as so aptly noted by H.N. Dixon (1941) “has not only done much to add to our knowledge of the highly interesting moss flora of New Zealand, but has stimulated interest in its study among many new workers.”
 Description

Leaves in 8–12 pairs, 0.4–0.7 × 0.15–0.20 mm; cells of apical and dorsal laminae (6–)7.5–12(–18) × (7–)7.5–10(–12) µm. Costa subpercurrent to percurrent.

Perichaetia terminal on short shoots, axillary at base of otherwise sterile shoots or apparently independent. Perigonia bud-like, at base of sterile or perichaetial shoots. Peristome sainsburia-type. Calyptra smooth, cucullate. Spores 15–25 µm.

 Illustrations

Wilson 1854, pl. 83, fig. 4 (as F. brevifolius); Stone & Beever 1996, figs 2, b, d, 3, b, d, 7, a–m; Beever et al. 2002, p. 66, figs 1–6.

 Taxonomy

This variety was originally described by Dixon (1941) as a monotypic genus, Sainsburia, owing to its peristome, in which the teeth are not split (sainsburia-type). The distinct peristome was regarded as taxonomically unimportant by Sainsbury (1955) who reduced Sainsburia novae-zealandiae to a synonym of F. taylorii, noting it was "a form marked by the teeth being cracked and erect instead of divided and incurved". Varietal status was proposed by Allison (1960), but the new combination was not validly published.

Bruggeman-Nannenga & Berendsen (1990) noted that, in addition to the gross morphology of the peristome teeth being anomalous in Fissidens, so also was the ornamentation. With SEM the rimose teeth are seen to have areas of thin, unornamented lamella in their mid line, adjacent to the original vertical walls of the component cells of the adaxial face of the teeth (Stone & Beever 1996, fig. 2d). A similar lack of ornamentation can occur at corresponding positions on the abaxial face. Tears (or perhaps dissolution) in this thin area result in a fenestrate tooth. The present author confirms the observations of Allison (1960) and Bruggeman-Nannenga & Berendsen (1990) that transitional forms between the sainsburia-type peristome and the bryoides-type of F. taylorii var. taylorii are not seen.

Teeth similar in form to the sainsburia-type are found in the Grimmiaceae, e.g., in Schistidium apocarpum (see Edwards 1984, figs 4, d, 7, n). The ornamentation of the teeth is also similar in S. apocarpum, the lamellae being densely papillose on both adaxial and abaxial faces of the teeth.

Considering the weight generally given to peristome morphology in the classification of mosses (see e.g., Vitt et al. 1998), the current nomenclatural status given to F. taylorii var. sainsburyanus is unusual.

 Distribution

K; NI: S Auckland, Hawke’s Bay, Wellington; SI: Nelson, Marlborough, Canterbury, Otago.

Australasian. Tasmania*, mainland Australia*.

 Habitat

Fissidens taylorii var. sainsburyanus occurs on bare soil, shaded or semi-shaded, often under exotic trees in urban settings such as parks or cemeteries, but also occasionally in indigenous vegetation. Associated mosses include F. curvatus var. inclinabilis, F. leptocladus and F. taylorii var. taylorii, as well as Bryum argenteum and Weissia controversa.

Records range from 20–60 m elevation.

 Biostatus
Indigenous (Non-endemic)
 Bibliography
Allison, K.W. 1960: Contributions to the knowledge of the New Zealand bryophyte flora. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 88: 9–12.
Beever, J.E. 2014: Fissidentaceae. In: Heenan, P.B.; Breitwieser, I.; Wilton, A.D. (ed.) Flora of New Zealand — Mosses. Fascicle 8. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln.
Beever, J.E.; Malcolm, B.; Malcolm, N. 2002: The Moss Genus Fissidens in New Zealand: an illustrated key. Micro-Optics Press, Nelson.
Bruggeman-Nannenga, M.A.; Berendsen, W. 1990: On the peristome types found in the Fissidentaceae and their importance for the classification. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 68: 193–234.
Dixon, H.N. 1941: Sainsburia, a new genus of Fissidentaceae. Bryologist 44: 40–41.
Edwards, S.R. 1984: Homologies and inter-relationships of moss peristomes. In: Schuster, R.M. New Manual of Bryology. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan. 658–695.
Sainsbury, G.O.K. 1955: A handbook of the New Zealand mosses. Bulletin of the Royal Society of New Zealand 5: 1–490.
Stone, I.G.; Beever, J.E. 1996: Studies of the Australasian moss Fissidens taylorii C. Muell. Journal of Bryology 19: 49–64.
Vitt, D.H.; Goffinet, B.; Hedderson, T. 1998: The ordinal classification of mosses: questions and answers for the 1990s. In: Bates, J.W., Ashton, N.W.; Duckett, J.G. (ed.) Bryology for the Twenty-First Century. Maney Publishing and British Byological Society, Leeds. 113–123.
Wilson, W. 1854 ("1855"): Musci. In: Hooker, J.D. The Botany of the Antarctic Voyage of H.M. Discovery Ships Erebus and Terror, in the years 1839–1843, under the command of Captain Sir James Clark Ross. II. Flora Novae-Zelandiae. Part II. Flowerless plants. Lovell Reeve, London. 57–125.