Classification
 Nomenclature
Scientific Name:
Rhizogonium Brid., Bryol. Univ. 2, 663 (1827)
Etymology:
According to Meagher (2011), the generic names alludes “to the fact that the sporophytes appear to arise from the ‘root’ of the plant… although they are actually borne on specialised branches at the base of the stem”. However, Crum & Anderson (1981, p. 657) suggest that Rhizogonium “refers to copious paraphyses suggesting a rooted sporophyte.”
 Description

Plants small or medium-sized, tufted or forming turves. Stems prostrate or erect, unbranched, with upper leaves distichous and lower leaves scale-like and unranked, in cross-section with a central strand and thick-walled cortical cells. Leaves uniform in shape, distichous, spreading, ovate, oblong-ovate, or ovate-lanceolate, plane at margins, with or without a border of elongate cells, moderately or strongly asymmetric at base, not or rarely decurrent, serrate or dentate above by single or rarely multicellular teeth. Upper laminal cells ± oblong-hexagonal and rounded, <2:1, firm-walled, smooth or rarely with fine cuticular striations, becoming ± more elongate in lower leaf; marginal cells not differentiated or elongate and forming a unistratose or rarely bistratose border; alar cells not differentiated. Costa excurrent (often strongly) or ending below the leaf apex, lacking abaxial teeth.

Dioicous. Perichaetia clustered or single at base of stem. Perigonia bud-like, clustered at base or scattered on lower stem, often difficult to observe. Setae elongate and straight; capsules horizontal or pendent, oblong-cylindric with a poorly defined neck; operculum rostrate from a conic base. Peristome double and well-developed; exostome teeth yellow-brown in N.Z. species, bordered, finely papillose or striolate below; endostome with a high basal membrane, segments nearly as long as the teeth, keeled but lacking perforations, cilia 2–3, well-developed or rudimentary. Calyptra cucullate. Spores small, finely papillose.

 Taxonomy

A genus of c. nine species distributed in Australasia, East Asia, Pacific Islands, and South America. Gilmore (2006) reported four species from Australia.

A type has not been designated for this genus.

The genus is here treated in a narrower sense than by Brotherus (1924). Manuel (1980) emended the genus to include only those species placed in section Rhizogonium Mitt., and in so doing, elevated section Pyrrhobryum (Mitt.) Mitt. to generic rank. Manuel’s interpretation of the genus Rhizogonium is accepted here. Matteri & Piñero (1987) provided useful notes on the genus in temperate South America.

Koponen et al. (1986) noted that some species retained in Rhizogonium by Manuel (e.g., R. pennatum) have multistratose leaf borders, but that in such instances the marginal cells were elongate, rather than short as in species of Pyrrhobryum. Other discrepancies exist between Manuel’s classification summary and N.Z. species, such as the occurrence of decurrent leaves in R. distichum.

 Key
1Costa ending several cells below the leaf apex, >100 µm wide and rather ill-defined near base; leaves decurrent, unbordered, >0.8 mm wide; margins dentate with mostly multicellular, broadly acute or obtuse teeth; endostomal cilia well-developedR. distichum
1'Costa excurrent to form an arista, <75 µm wide and well-defined near base; leaves not decurrent, bordered or not, <0.6 mm wide; margins serrate or serrate-spinose with mostly one-celled and acute teeth; endostome cilia well-developed or rudimentary2
2Vegetative leaves bordered by 3–5 rows of elongate cells, usually >1.9 mm long; stem cross-section lacking parenchyma, with c. 5 layers of thick-walled cells surrounding a large central strand; endostomal cilia well-developedR. pennatum
2'Vegetative leaves unbordered, <1.7 mm long; stem cross-section with a layer of thin-walled parenchyma cells between the cortical cells and the central strand; endostomal cilia rudimentaryR. novae-hollandiae
 Biostatus
Indigenous (Non-endemic)
Number of species in New Zealand within Rhizogonium Brid.
CategoryNumber
Indigenous (Non-endemic)3
Total3
 Bibliography
Bridel, S.-E. 1827: Bryologia Universa seu systematica ad novam methodum dispositio, historia et descriptio omnium muscorum frondosorum huscusque cognitorum cum synonymia ex auctoribus probatissimis. Vol. 2. Barth, Leipzig.
Brotherus, V.F. 1924: Musci (Laubmoose). II. Spezieller Teil. In: Engler, A. (ed.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Edition 2. Bd 10. Engelmann, Leipzig. 143–478.
Crum, H.A.; Anderson, L.E. 1981: Mosses of Eastern North America. Columbia University Press, New York.
Fife, A.J. 2016: Rhizogoniaceae. In: Heenan, P.B.; Breitwieser, I.; Wilton, A.D. (ed.) Flora of New Zealand — Mosses. Fascicle 26. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln.
Gilmore, S.R. 2006: Rhizogoniaceae. In: McCarthy, P.M. (ed.) Flora of Australia. Vol. 51 Mosses 1. ABRS, Canberra. 354–366.
Goffinet, B.; Buck, W.R.; Shaw, A.J. 2009: Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta. In: Goffinet, B.; Shaw, A.J. (ed.) Bryophyte Biology. Edition 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 55–138.
Koponen, T.; Touw, A.; Norris, D.H. 1986: Bryophyte flora of the Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea. XIV. Rhizogoniaceae (Musci). Acta Botanica Fennica 133: 1–24.
Manuel, G. 1980: Miscellanea bryologica II. Classification of Rhizogonium Brid. Penzigiella hookeri Gangulee, and some nomina nuda. Cryptogamie - Bryologie et Lichénologie 1: 67–72.
Matteri, C.M.; Piñero, M.R. 1987: Sinopsis de las Rhizogoniaceae (Musci) en las regiones Fueguina y Patagonica. Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia 17: 59–65.
Meagher, D. 2011: An etymology of Australian bryophyte genera. 2 – Mosses. Muelleria 29: 33–61.