Classification
 Nomenclature
Scientific Name:
Orthotrichum Hedw., Sp. Musc. Frond. 162 (1801)
Synonymy:
  • = Muelleriella Dusén, Bot. Not. 1905: 304 (1905)
Type Taxon:
Orthotrichum anomalum Hedw.
Etymology:
The generic name Orthotrichum refers to the straight hairs usually found on the calyptrae in this genus. Orthotrichum is one of few moss genera with a widely-applied English common name – bristle mosses – also in reference to the calyptra hairs.
 Description

Plants small or robust, dark green, brown-, yellow-green, or rarely black, dull, mostly forming tufts (rarely small mats) on bark or rock. Stems erect, ascendant, or rarely creeping, branching by innovation or occasionally forking, in cross-section lacking a central strand, beset below with smooth, mostly brown rhizoids. Leaves erect, incurved or rarely contorted when dry, spreading or erect-spreading when moist, ovate-lanceolate, narrowly lanceolate, oblong-lanceolate, or rarely ligulate-lanceolate, acute, acuminate, or obtuse, plicate or not, entire; margins mostly recurved or revolute, rarely plane; mid and upper laminal cells rounded to ± hexagonal, ± isodiametric, thick-walled, usually unistratose, rarely 2–(3–4)-stratose and opaque, mostly pluripapillose on both surfaces, rarely only slightly papillose or smooth; basal interior cells rectangular, rhomboid, or rarely ± quadrate, thick- or thin-walled, porose or not, often coloured; cells of basal margins often shorter and extending up the margins, but not forming a distinct hyaline border; alar cells not differentiated. Costa mostly failing below the leaf apex, in cross-section with no differentiated guide cells or stereids. Gemmae occasionally present on leaves.

Autoicous (often gonioautoicous) or rarely dioicous. Perichaetia terminal, with perichaetial leaves not or slightly larger than vegetative leaves. Perigonia often gemmiform and immediately below the perichaetia. Setae one to several per perichaetium, straight, slender to stout, very short to elongate, smooth; capsules emergent, immersed, or exserted, erect and symmetric, ovoid-cylindric, subcylindric, broadly ovoid, or rarely nearly globose, mostly striate and furrowed (especially when dry) but sometimes smooth; exothecial cells often in alternating bands of thick- and thin-walled (the thicker-walled cells corresponding with ribs in dry capsules) and variably pigmented cells, with several rows ± oblate and thicker-walled at mouth; stomata superficial or immersed, variably distributed in the capsule wall (not restricted to neck); annulus absent or poorly developed; operculum short-rostrate (rarely obliquely so) from a conic or convex base. Peristome double, single, or rarely absent, with 16 (but often paired) teeth which are variably papillose or striate, and recurved, spreading, or almost erect when dry; preperistome present or absent; endostome, if present, lacking a basal membrane and composed of 8 or 16 filiform segments which alternate with the teeth. Calyptra campanulate-mitrate, hairy or naked. Spores extremely variable, either isosporous or anisosporous, unicellular or multicellular, variable in shape and size.

 Taxonomy

Orthotrichum is a large genus of temperate distribution in both northern and southern hemispheres. Lewinsky (1993) considered it to consist of 116 species distributed in seven subgenera (but she did not fuse Muelleriella with Orthotrichum). The genus is interpreted more broadly here to include the species placed by Sainsbury (1955) and by Vitt (1976) in the genus Muelleriella. Twelve species (six endemic) and two varieties (both endemic) are accepted as part of our flora. Orthotrichum cupulatum var. austro-cupulatum, which Lewinsky recognised, is not accepted here.

Orthotrichum is a taxonomically difficult genus growing on trees and shrubs and on rock. With a few exceptions, the N.Z. species of Orthotrichum cannot be confidently recognised without microscopic examination. Characterisation of the stomata (whether superficial or immersed, etc.) is facilitated by making a longitudinal section of a mature capsule in 95% ethanol. The ethanol will serve as a spore dispersant and facilitate visualisation of the stomata. Transferring the sectioned capsule between ethanol and water repeatedly will further disperse the spores. Until one is very well acquainted with the regional flora, microscopic examination of the stomata is recommended, as species with superficial and immersed stomata can be very similar in appearance.

Orthotrichum (in a traditional taxonomic sense) was masterfully treated by Lewinsky (1984) for Australasia. However, for reasons given below, the genus is treated here in a broader sense than by Lewinsky. For most of the included species, the treatments here are derived, with permission, from Lewinsky’s elegantly illustrated revision. In CHR and WELT Lewinsky typically named and isolated all the species found in single collections. Her meticulously annotated segregates within single herbarium specimens are a valuable resource for anyone seriously wishing to come to grips with this difficult genus regionally.

Lewinsky (1984, p. 395) stated that the Australasian Orthotrichum flora differed from that of North America and Europe by having a smaller fraction (only three of the 11 taxa treated by her) of taxa with immersed stomata; by contrast 11 of 19 British species recognised by Smith (2004) have immersed stomata. Lewinsky-Haapasaari & Ramsay (2006) noted that of the five species occurring in Australia, all those with immersed stomata have the chromosome number n = 6, while those with superficial stomata have n = 11.

Lewinsky (1984) provided detailed distribution maps and a summary of the substrate preferences (see her Table 1) for all taxa. Among the introduced woody plant genera Fraxinus, Populus, and Salix support the greatest diversity of species. The N.Z. distributions and ecological notes presented by Lewinsky form the basis of those given below, but they have been confirmed and expanded where possible using herbarium specimens in AK, CHR, and WELT. Many of Lewinsky’s records seem to be derived from her painstaking determinations of multiple species within herbarium collections. The species descriptions below are largely modified from those of Lewinsky (1984).

Goffinet et al. (2004) used molecular data from four ribosomal, mitochondrial, and nuclear loci to evaluate relationships among the subfamily Orthotrichoideae; Orthotrichum is presented here in the broader sense dictated by their conclusions. The species traditionally placed in the segregate genus Muelleriella (Brotherus 1925) can be distinguished from Orthotrichum s.s. by several morphological features, including multicellular spores, a single peristome with a well-developed preperistome, multistratose leaf lamina, and nearly black colour. These species are also specialised in terms of habitat and are almost exclusively found on coastal rocks, often those exposed to extensive salt spray, in austral regions. Lewinsky (1993) argued in favour of the continued recognition of Muelleriella. However, the evidence provided by Goffinet et al. (2004) supporting the inclusion of Muelleriella within Orthotrichum seems incontrovertible. Interestingly, Goffinet’s inclusion of Muelleriella within Orthotrichum accords with the treatment of Dixon (1926, p. 170), who included a group "Crassifolia" of unspecified rank. The taxa previously assigned to Muelleriella clearly comprise a natural and probably monophyletic subgroup within Orthotrichum.

A synopis of the systematic relationships Lewinsky (1993) accepted for Australasian taxa of Orthotrichum s.s. (excluding the species sometimes placed in Muelleriella) is presented below.

 Key
1Plants on coastal rocks, mostly dark brown to black; leaves appearing very thick and opaque; upper laminal cells bistratose (or sometimes thicker) and smooth or nearly so; capsules smooth when dry; spores multicellular, variable in shape, mostly >40 µm [formerly in Muelleriella]2
1'Plants epiphytic or on inland rocks, paler, mostly brown below and yellow-green to brown-green above, leaves not thick and opaque; upper laminal cells unistratose and nearly always papillose; capsules striate when dry; spores 1-celled, globose, <30 µm [Orthotrichum s.s.]4
2Capsules exserted or emergent, 1.0–1.8 mm; setae 1.0–2.6(–2.8) mm; leaves mostly ligulate-lanceolate or ligulate from an obovate or ovate base, mostly obtuse at apex; known from the South I., Stewart I., and southern offshore islandsO. crassifolium subsp. crassifolium
2'Capsules immersed, generally <1.2 mm; setae <1.1(–1.3) mm; leaves narrowly lanceolate, subulate or rarely ligulate from an ovate base; known only from southern offshore islands3
3Leaves narrowly lanceolate to broadly subulate from an oblong-ovate base, 3.0–4.7 mm, usually ± secund when dry; capsule mouth below the middle of enclosing perichaetial leaves; known from Campbell I.O. angustifolium
3'Leaves narrowly ligulate from an ovate base, 1.8–3.0(–3.9) mm, not secund, twisted and inwardly curved when dry; capsule mouth usually between middle (or slightly lower) and the apices of the enclosing perichaetial leaves; known from the Auckland IsO. aucklandicum
4Stomata superficial; basal laminal cells usually with nodose and porose walls5
4'Stomata immersed; basal laminal cells usually with smooth walls12
5Exostome erect-spreading when dry, roughly papillose; endostome often absent; preperistome present or absent; plants mostly on non-calcareous rock [O. rupestre s.l.]6
5'Exostome recurved when dry, moderately-finely papillose; endostome present; preperistome absent; plants mostly epiphytic, occasionally on rock7
6Plants not glaucous; leaves moderately papillose; papillae of mid laminal cells usually 2–7 µm high, not conspicuously branched; leaf apex never erose-dentateO. rupestre var. rupestre
6'Plants glaucous; leaves highly papillose; papillae of mid laminal cells usually 7–15 µm high and conspicuously branched; leaf apex erose-dentate, particularly in young leavesO. rupestre var. papillosum
7Capsules smooth or furrowed only in the upper half when dry; endostome with broad, papillose segments, mostly of two rows of cells (at least near base)8
7'Capsules furrowed along entire length when dry; endostome with narrow segments, mostly of one row of cells10
8Capsules exserted or emergent, cylindric, mouth wide when dry; exothecial cells elongate, often with thickened longitudinal walls, weakly or clearly differentiated into bands [O. tasmanicum s.l.]9
8'Capsules immersed, broadly ovoid or broadly ellipsoid, narrowed at the mouth when dry; exothecial cells mostly rounded-oblong or oblong-hexagonal, not differentiated into bands, thin-walledO. graphiomitrium
9Setae elongate, mostly 4–7 mm, exposed for 1–4 mm beyond the perichaetial leaves (best seen in moist material); capsules usually 1, rarely 2–3 per perichaetium, exserted, furrowed or rarely smooth in upper half of urn when dry, 1.5–2.5 mmO. tasmanicum var. tasmanicum
9'Setae short, 1–3.5(–4.0) mm, not exposed or exposed for ≤2 mm beyond the perichaetial leaves (best seen in moist material); capsules mostly 2–4(–5) (but occasionally only 1) per perichaetium, immersed to short-exserted, smooth when dry, 1.0–1.5 mmO. tasmanicum var. parvithecum
10Leaves from an oblong-lanceolate base, obtuse, rounded, or rarely rounded-acute; calyptra naked; upper laminal cells indistinctly papillose (usually visible only when cells are viewed on edge)O. cyathiforme
10'Leaves from an ovate-lanceolate base, long acute-acuminate; calyptra ± hairy; upper laminal cells usually more distinctly papillose (papillae usually visible in surface view)11
11Exostome teeth 8, pale yellow-hyaline, papillose with vermicular lines near apex; endostome of 8 hyaline-pale yellow segments with elongate papillae, sometimes smooth; basal marginal cells smooth to >300 µm above the leaf base, the papillae of marginal cells further from the base low, <c. 5 µm, unbranchedO. hortense
11'Exostome teeth 16 orange-red, papillose with vertical lines near the base; endostome of 16 orange-hyaline segments with rounded papillae; basal marginal cells papillose to within c. 100–300 µm of the leaf base; the papillae of marginal cells further from base rapidly becoming tall (often 9–15 µm tall) and either unbranched or branchedO. sainsburyi
12Capsules with 16 or 8 furrows when dry; exostome erect-spreading when dry; preperistome mostly present, sometimes covering the entire surface of the exostome teeth; on calcareous rocksO. cupulatum
12'Capsules with 8 furrows when dry (lacking alternate short furrows); exostome recurved when dry; preperistome absent; mostly epiphytic, less commonly on calcareous or non-calcareous rocks13
13Leaves erect and appressed when dry, oblong-lanceolate from an ovate base with a short obtuse-acute apex, entire or rarely dentate at apex; calyptra with many or few hairs; capsules immersed-emergentO. assimile
13'Leaves contorted and twisted when dry, lanceolate from an ovate base with a long acute-slightly obtuse apex, entire; calyptra naked or rarely with a few hairs; capsules exserted or rarely emergentO. calvum
 Recognition

Species of Orthotrichum can usually be differentiated from Ulota by having less crisped leaves when dry, much less thick-walled (especially the transverse walls) marginal basal laminal cells of the leaves, and by stomata that are either superficial or immersed and not confined to the capsule base. In Ulota the stomata are invariably superficial and confined to the capsule base. Orthotrichum calvum is the one species most likely to be misidentified as a species of Ulota.

 Biostatus
Indigenous (Non-endemic)
Number of species in New Zealand within Orthotrichum Hedw.
CategoryNumber
Indigenous (Endemic)6
Indigenous (Non-endemic)6
Total12
 Bibliography
Brotherus, V.F. 1925: Musci (Laubmoose). In: Engler, A. (ed.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Edition 2. Bd 11. Engelmann, Leipzig. 1–542.
Calabrese, G.M. 2006: A taxonomic revision of Zygodon (Orthotrichaceae) in southern South America. Bryologist 109: 453–509.
Dixon, H.N. 1926: Studies in the bryology of New Zealand, with special reference to the herbarium of Robert Brown. Part IV. Bulletin, New Zealand Institute 3(4): 153–238.
Dusén, P. 1905: Musci nonnullii novi e Fuegia et Patagonia reportati. Botaniska Notiser 1905: 299–310.
Fife, A.J. 2017: Orthotrichaceae. In: Breitwieser, I.; Wilton, A.D. (ed.) Flora of New Zealand – Mosses. Fascicle 31. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln.
Goffinet, B.; Buck, W.R.; Shaw, A.J. 2009: Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta. In: Goffinet, B.; Shaw, A.J. (ed.) Bryophyte Biology. Edition 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 55–138.
Goffinet, B.; Shaw, A.J.; Cox, C.J.; Wickett, N.J.; Boles, S.B. 2004: Phylogenetic inferences in the Orthotrichoideae (Orthotrichaceae, Bryophyta) based on variation in four loci from all genomes. In: Hollowell, V.B (ed.) Molecular Systematics of Bryophytes. Vol. 98. In: Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden. 270–289.
Hedwig, J. 1801: Species Muscorum Frondosorum descriptae et tabulis aeneis lxxvii coloratis illustratae. Barth, Leipzig.
Lewinsky, J. 1984: The genus Orthotrichum Hedw. (Musci) in Australasia: a taxonomic revision. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 56: 369–460.
Lewinsky, J. 1993: A synopsis of the genus Orthotrichum Hedw. (Musci, Orthotrichaceae). Bryobrothera 2: 1–59.
Lewinsky-Haapasaari, J.; Ramsay, H.P. 2006: Orthotrichum. In: McCarthy, P.M. (ed.) Flora of Australia. Vol. 51 Mosses 1. ABRS, Canberra. 218–244.
Sainsbury, G.O.K. 1955: A handbook of the New Zealand mosses. Bulletin of the Royal Society of New Zealand 5: 1–490.
Smith, A.J.E. 2004: The Moss Flora of Britain and Ireland. Edition 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Vitt, D.H. 1976: A monograph of the genus Muelleriella Dusén. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 40: 91–113.