Classification
 Nomenclature
Scientific Name:
Pohlia Hedw., Sp. Musc. Frond. 171 (1801)
Synonymy:
  • = Webera Hedw., Sp. Musc. Frond. 168 (1801) nom. illeg., non Webera Schreb. 1791
  • = Mniobryum Limpr., Laubm. Deutschland 2, 272 (1892)
Type Taxon:
Etymology:
The generic name honours J.E. Pohl (1706–1780), a physician of Leipzig and Dresden.
 Description

Plants erect, small to medium-sized, in loose or dense turves, tufts, or scattered among other mosses, dull or lustrous, variably coloured. Stems mostly simple, sometimes forked, or branching by innovation, in cross-section with a central strand, with papillose or rarely nearly smooth rhizoids. Leaves often crowded near the shoot apex, erect or erect spreading when moist, mostly little altered when dry, ovate-lanceolate to narrowly lanceolate or rarely ovate, acute, not bordered, ± toothed near apex or teeth extending c. ½ the leaf; upper laminal cells oblong-rhomboidal to linear, thin- or thick-walled, sometimes narrower at margins but not forming a distinct border, becoming shorter and laxer towards the insertion. Costa usually rather narrow, percurrent, ending below the apex, or rarely excurrent. Axillary gemmae frequent in some species but absent in others, clustered or solitary, bulbous or elongate.

Dioicous, paroicous or rarely autoicous (fide Shaw). Perichaetia terminal, usually with the ♀ leaves enlarged. Perigonia terminal or lacking. Setae usually single, elongate, flexuose and twisted when dry, usually curved or hooked just below the capsule; capsules inclined, pendent, or rarely suberect, ± symmetric, elongate and clavate, pyriform, or sometimes short-ovoid, with a long or short sterile neck; annulus mostly present and revoluble; operculum conic, mammillate, or short-rostrate; stomata superficial or rarely immersed. Peristome double; exostome teeth 16, lanceolate, variable in colour, not or narrowly bordered; endostome arising from a short or tall finely papillose basal membrane, with segments keeled and usually perforate, and cilia either well-developed and nodulose or rarely rudimentary. Calyptra cucullate, smooth. Spores spherical, finely papillose.

 Taxonomy

Pohlia is a large genus of nearly cosmopolitan distribution, although tropical species occur predominantly at higher elevation and even temperate species are largely confined to mountainous areas. Shaw (in Shaw & Ramsay 2013) considered it to include about 85 species, whereas earlier authors (e.g., Brotherus 1924, as Webera and Mniobryum) considered the genus to include a larger number of species.

Species of Pohlia are most likely to be confused with Bryum, but the present genus has more elongate laminal cells and leaves that lack a distinct border. The costa here nearly always ends in or below the leaf apex, while in Bryum the costa is often excurrent. According to Shaw & Ramsay, no species of Pohlia have appendiculate cilia (with the possible exception of P. nutans) or synoicous perichaetia, both of which are common in Bryum s.l. Confusion could also occur with Mielichhoferia, but the sole N.Z. representative of that genus has basal paroicous or synoicous perichaetia as well as suberect capsules with a single peristome.

There is an inexplicable lack of Pohlia (or Webera and Mniobryum) collections in the T.W.N. Beckett herbarium at CHR.

The family placement of Pohlia has attracted much attention in recent years. The decision to treat Pohlia in the Mielichhoferiaceae follows Shaw & Ramsay’s (2013) treatment of the Australian members. Their placement of the genus here was informed by the study of Cox & Hedderson (2003). Goffinet et al. (2009) and other recent authors, including Smith (2004), have recently treated it as a member of the Mniaceae, while Sainsbury (1955) followed many earlier authors to treat this genus as part of the Bryaceae.

Approximately half of the species of Pohlia occurring in New Zealand are also widespread in the northern hemisphere, and so floristic accounts such as Crum & Anderson (1981), Smith (2004), and Shaw (1981) are useful here. A treatment of Pohlia in South Georgia has been provided by Clarke (1973). Little has been published since Sainsbury (1955) dealing specifically with N.Z. species, with the exception of the key to gemmae-bearing species and the description of P. australis by Shaw & Fife (1985).

 Key
1Plants with axillary gemmae2
1'Plants lacking axillary gemmae5
2Plants decidedly glossy; gemmae linear-vermicular, greater than 500 µm long, with 1–2 short, peg-like leaf primordiaP. ochii
2'Plants dull or weakly lustrous; gemmae spherical to oblong, less than 400 µm long, with 3–8 peg-like or laminate leaf primordia3
3Leaves 1.5–2.0 mm, strongly decurrent, strongly and rather sharply serrulate near apex; axillary gemmae oblong, 200–400 µm, with broadly triangular leaf primordiaP. australis
3'Leaves 0.7–1.4 mm, weakly decurrent, bluntly serrulate near apex; axillary gemmae more variable in shape, often spherical, sometimes obovoid to clavate-vermicular; with short and peg-like leaf primordia4
4Plants dull; axillary gemmae consistently spherical to obovoid, c. 105–130 × c. 75–90 μm (excluding stalk), with uniseriate or biseriate stalksP. camptotrachela
4'Plants weakly lustrous; axillary gemmae mostly clavate-vermicular but some obovoid, at least some to 300 µm or greater in length, stalks not obvious or absentP. annotina
5Leaves lanceolate-subulate, widest at insertionP. tenuifolia
5'Leaves not lanceolate-subulate, broader in outline and widest above the insertion6
6Plants lustrous, with a conspicuous metallic sheen; endostomal cilia nodose, mostly pairedP. cruda
6'Plants not distinctly lustrous, lacking a conspicuous metallic sheen; endostomal cilia either rudimentary or well-developed7
7Capsules narrowly cylindric, with the neck equal to the urn in length, inclined to suberect, c. 4.5–5.0 mm; paroicous in N.Z.; endostomal cilia mostly rudimentary and pairedP. elongata
7'Capsules not narrowly cylindric, with a neck c. ½ the length of the urn horizontal to pendent, ≤4.0 mm; dioicous (P. wahlenbergii), paroicous or sometimes synoicous (P. nutans); endostomal cilia well-developed and nodose or appendiculate8
8Plants whitish or glaucous-green when fresh; upper laminal cells thin-walled and lax, linear-rhombic; dioicous; setae single and rather short, c. 12 mm; capsules pendent, very short, ≤2.0 mm; stomata immersed; endostomal cilia mostly paired and nodose, not appendiculateP. wahlenbergii
8'Plants not glaucous when fresh; upper laminal cells thick-walled, linear; paroicous or synoicous; setae longer, often very elongate, c.18–35(–70) mm; capsules horizontal or nutant, mostly longer, 2.5–4.0 mm; stomata superficial; endostomal cilia paired or in 3s, either nodose or appendiculateP. nutans
 Biostatus
Indigenous (Non-endemic)
Number of species in New Zealand within Pohlia Hedw.
CategoryNumber
Indigenous (Endemic)3
Indigenous (Non-endemic)4
Exotic: Fully Naturalised2
Total9
 Bibliography
Brotherus, V.F. 1924: Musci (Laubmoose). II. Spezieller Teil. In: Engler, A. (ed.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Edition 2. Bd 10. Engelmann, Leipzig. 143–478.
Clarke, G.C.S. 1973: A synoptic flora of South Georgian mosses: III. Leptotheca, Philonotis, Mielichhoferia and Pohlia. Bulletin, British Antarctic Survey 37: 53–79.
Cox, C.J.; Hedderson, T.A.J. 2003: Phylogenetic relationships within the moss family Bryaceae based on chloroplast DNA evidence. Journal of Bryology 25: 31–40.
Crum, H.A.; Anderson, L.E. 1981: Mosses of Eastern North America. Columbia University Press, New York.
Dixon, H.N. 1926: Studies in the bryology of New Zealand, with special reference to the herbarium of Robert Brown. Part IV. Bulletin, New Zealand Institute 3(4): 153–238.
Fife, A.J. 2020: Mielichhoferiaceae. In: Smissen, R. (ed.) Flora of New Zealand – Mosses. Fascicle 47. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln.
Goffinet, B.; Buck, W.R.; Shaw, A.J. 2009: Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta. In: Goffinet, B.; Shaw, A.J. (ed.) Bryophyte Biology. Edition 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 55–138.
Hedwig, J. 1801: Species Muscorum Frondosorum descriptae et tabulis aeneis lxxvii coloratis illustratae. Barth, Leipzig.
Limpricht, K.G. 1890–1895: Die Laubmoose Deutschlands, Oesterreichs und der Schweiz. Dr. L. Rabenhorst's Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Oesterreich und der Schweiz. Bd. 4, Abt. 2. Kummer, Leipzig.
Sainsbury, G.O.K. 1955: A handbook of the New Zealand mosses. Bulletin of the Royal Society of New Zealand 5: 1–490.
Shaw, A.J. 1981: A taxonomic revision of the propaguliferous species of Pohlia (Musci) in North America. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 50: 1–81.
Shaw, A.J.; Fife, A.J. 1985: Pohlia australis sp. nov. (Musci) from New Zealand with notes on some other austral Pohlias. New Zealand Journal of Botany 23: 183–186.
Shaw, A.J.; Ramsay, H.P. 2013: Australian Mosses Online. 69. Mielichhoferiaceae. ABRS, Canberra. Version 2 May 2013. http://www.anbg.gov.au/abrs/Mosses_online/69_Mielichhoferiaceae.html
Smith, A.J.E. 2004: The Moss Flora of Britain and Ireland. Edition 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.