Classification
 Subordinate Taxa
 Nomenclature
Scientific Name:
Eriodon Mont., Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. sér. 3, 4: 98 (1845)
Synonymy:
  • = Helicodontiadelphus Dixon, J. Bot. 74: 5 (1936)
Type Taxon:
Eriodon conostomus Mont. ≡ Rhynchostegium conostomum (Mont.) Huttenen & Ignatov
 Taxonomy

Eriodon was created by Montagne to accommodate a Chilean species of Brachytheciaceae characterised in part by extremely long (equalling half the capsule length) peristome teeth and a long and finely rostrate operculum. Brotherus (1925) recognised two species of Eriodon, both South American. Other species, to a total of nine, have been described in or transferred to the genus. Buck (1981b) transferred three species of these nine to other genera (disposed in three separate families). The single N.Z. species has been treated as a Rhynchostegium by Hedenäs (2002), but his proposed placement is not followed here, mainly due to sporophyte morphological differences between the genera.

Buck (1981b) characterised the genus as “smallish subcomplanate plants with ovate-lanceolate, unicostate leaves, margins serrulate throughout, linear laminal cells, alar cells differentiated only in the extreme basal angles, an autoicous sexual condition and suberect capsules. The exostome is papillose, with the papillae arranged in horizontal rows at the base of the teeth. The endostome is papillose throughout with a relatively high basal membrane and narrow segments. The operculum is long-rostrate.”

Although it was originally described in Rhynchostegium​​​​​, the peristome of Eriodon cylindritheca differs strongly from both other N.Z. species of that genus and from the European type species (R. confertum (Dicks.) Schimp.). In E. cylindritheca (and the one specimen of E. conostomus available for examination), the exostome teeth are pale, linear, bordered below, not shouldered and coarsely papillose-baculate throughout on the outer surface. The papillae are arranged in transverse rows on the lowermost plates. In both species the endostome is papillose-baculate throughout, arises from a basal membrane (which is 200–240 µm high in the type species), and has very long, linear segments. Cilia have not been seen in the type species, but they are also sometimes weakly developed in E. cylindritheca.

The description of E. cylindritheca, below, is presented here as representative of the genus.

 Biostatus
Indigenous (Non-endemic)
Number of species in New Zealand within Eriodon Mont.
CategoryNumber
Indigenous (Non-endemic)1
Total1
 Bibliography
Brotherus, V.F. 1925: Musci (Laubmoose). In: Engler, A. (ed.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Edition 2. Bd 11. Engelmann, Leipzig. 1–542.
Buck, W.R. 1981a: A re-interpretation of the Fabroniaceae, III: Anacamptodon and Fabronidium revisisted, Mamillariella, Helicodontiadelphus and Bryobartlettia gen. nov. Brittonia 33: 473–481. [as Helicodontiadelphus Dixon]
Buck, W.R. 1981b: The taxonomy of Eriodon and notes on other South American genera of Brachytheciaceae with erect capsules. Brittonia 33: 556–563.
Dixon, H.N. 1936: Decas generum novorum muscorum. Journal of Botany, British and Foreign 74: 1–10.
Fife, A.J. 2020: Brachytheciaceae. In: Smissen, R.; Wilton, A.D. (ed.) Flora of New Zealand – Mosses. Fascicle 46. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln.
Goffinet, B.; Buck, W.R.; Shaw, A.J. 2009: Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta. In: Goffinet, B.; Shaw, A.J. (ed.) Bryophyte Biology. Edition 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 55–138.
Hedenäs, L. 2002: An overview of the family Brachytheciaceae (Bryophyta) in Australia. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 92: 51–90.
Meagher, D. 2011: An etymology of Australian bryophyte genera. 2 – Mosses. Muelleria 29: 33–61.
Montagne, J.P.F.C. 1845: Cinquième centurie de plantes cellulaires exotiques nouvelles. Décades I à VI. Annales des Sciences Naturelles; Botanique sér. 3, 4: 86–123.