Classification
 Nomenclature
Scientific Name:
Eurhynchium speciosum (Brid.) Jur., Verh. K. K. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien 13: 500 (1863)
Synonymy:
  • Hypnum speciosum Brid., Muscol. Recent. Suppl. 2, 105 (1812)
  • Oxyrrhynchium speciosum (Brid.) Warnst., Krypt.-Fl. Brandenburg, Laubm. 786 (1905)
Type: Europe. Not seen.
  • = Hypnum trachypelma Müll.Hal., Bot. Zeitung (Berlin) 15: 780 (1857)
Lectotype: N.Z., Kermadec Islands, Sunday Island, over the mountain, July 1854, Milne 91, NY-Mitten! (Designated by Beever et al., 1996.)
  • = Eurhynchium ellipticifolium Dixon & Sainsbury in Sainsbury, Trans. & Proc. Roy. Soc. New Zealand 75: 184 (1945)
Isotypes: N.Z., between Lake Rotoehu & the coast, Bay of Plenty, 11 Aug. 1943, K.W. Allison 667, (herb. Sainsbury 983) WELT M005722!, CHR 570079!
Etymology:
The epithet speciosum means "striking" or "worth looking at".
 Description

Plants medium-sized, yellow- or dirty-green, lustrous, forming rather rough and irregular wefts. Stems creeping, irregularly to subpinnately branched, short or elongate (to >100 mm long); branches ascendant, simple or sparsely branched, mostly 6–12 mm. Stem leaves rather distant, spreading, broadly ovate, abruptly tapered to a short and sometimes twisted acumen, sharply serrulate throughout, weakly decurrent, scarcely concave, not plicate, 1.5–1.8 × 0.65–1.0 mm; costa tapered, extending c. ¾ the leaf length, lacking a terminal spine; mid laminal cells linear, firm-walled, weakly prorate at upper end, mostly 120–165 × c. 6 µm, becoming shorter and broader at insertion; cells of the acumen not differentiated; alar cells scarcely differentiated, forming weak decurrencies. Branch leaves differentiated, complanate, broadly ovate to nearly elliptic, acute or broadly acuminate, weakly asymmetric at base, c. 1.4 × 0.6 mm; costa extending c. ¾ to ⅞ the leaf length, nearly uniform in width throughout, with a conspicuous terminal abaxial spine.

Autoicous or synoicous. Perichaetia scattered on stems, with leaves squarrose from a sheathing base, ecostate. Perigonia, scattered if present, with wide-spreading bracts and filiform paraphyses. Setae slender and elongate, 15–22 mm, red-brown, finely papillose throughout (usually not visible under hand-lens); capsules oblong-cylindric, narrowed below mouth when dry, ± horizontal, c. 2.0 mm; exothecial cells mostly rounded-oblong, thick-walled, very weakly thickened in corners; stomata few at capsule base; annulus and operculum not seen. Exostome teeth as for genus, c. 500 µm; endostome as for genus, cilia paired. Spores 18–21 µm, smooth.

 Illustrations

Smith 2004, fig. 287, 1–4 (as Oxyrrhynchium speciosum).           

 Distribution

K; NI: N Auckland, S Auckland. SI: Westland? (see notes below)

Probably adventive. Largely confined to Europe but reported from Iran, Saudi Arabia, China and Macaronesia by Smith (2004). Jessica Beever (pers. comm., 3 May 2019) considers this species to be “quite common” in N Auckland L.D. The tentative Westland record is from the “Lake Brunner shore” and collected by M.F. Sinclair in 1970. The small sterile fragment I have seen of this collection appears to be correctly determined and bears a note by K.W. Allison that he had seen one sporophyte with a “sparsely and lowly papillose” seta. The occurrence of this species on the South I. requires confirmation.

 Habitat

Occurring on Kermadec Islands from sea level to c. 150 m; on the North I. from near sea level to 450 m (Whirinaki Forest, S Auckland L.D.). On Raoul I. (Kermadecs) this species is often collected in a variety of mostly modified vegetation types, including underneath Mysore thorn (Caesalpinia decapetala); it is often associated with Racopilum cuspidigerum var. convolutaceum. The majority of the North I. collections are from either damp hollows or damp sites adjacent to streams and probably subject to periodic flooding. There is little constancy in associated vegetation types; they include native forest (with kahikatea, taraire, etc.), mixed bracken and Phormium, and adventive grasses. The indicated substrates were soil and rotten logs.

 Biostatus
Exotic
 Notes

Beever et al. (1996) discussed the typification of the synonymous Hypnum trachypelma Müll.Hal. Material reported by Sykes (1977) from the Kermadecs as Rhynchostegiella vitiensis Dixon [Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales 55: 300, 1930] was tentatively referred to E. speciosum by Beever et al. (1996). There are three sterile specimens in herb. J.E. Beever from N Auckland L.D. that have branch leaves more lanceolate and plicate when dry than the other N.Z. material.

The relationship between the present species and the widely distributed northern hemisphere E. hians (Hedw.) Sande Lac. [Ann. Mus. Bot. Lugduno-Batavi 2: 299, 1866] is unclear and beyond the scope of this eFlora treatment. All fruiting N.Z. material is either synoicous or autoicous (or polyoicous?) and thus conforms with the sexuality of E. speciosum given in European floras (cf. Limpricht 1895–1903; Smith 2004). There are, however, several sterile N.Z. collections that are probably dioicous (which is the sexual state of E. hians in central Europe, fide Limpricht 1895–1903) and eastern North America (fide Crum & Anderson 1981). I can find no other morphological differences between the limited North American material of E. hians studied (including S. Rapp 61, CHR 649698) and confirmed NZ material of E. speciosum.

No comparison has been made of E. speciosum to E. laevisetum Geh. of eastern Australia. Apart from alleged differences in sexuality, the dioicous E. laevisetum is distinguished from the present species by Hedenäs (2002) by a series of overlapping quantitative characters that are not fully convincing.

 Bibliography
Beever, J.E.; Fife, A.J.; West, C.J. 1996: Mosses of the Kermadec Islands, northern New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 34: 463–471.
Bridel, S.-E. 1812: Muscologia Recentiorum Supplementum seu Species Muscorum. Vol. 2. Ettinger, Gotha.
Crum, H.A.; Anderson, L.E. 1981: Mosses of Eastern North America. Columbia University Press, New York.
Fife, A.J. 2020: Brachytheciaceae. In: Smissen, R.; Wilton, A.D. (ed.) Flora of New Zealand – Mosses. Fascicle 46. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln.
Hedenäs, L. 2002: An overview of the family Brachytheciaceae (Bryophyta) in Australia. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 92: 51–90.
Juratzka, J. 1863: Zur Moosflora Oesterreichs. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 13: 499–504.
Limpricht, K.G. 1895–1903: Die Laubmoose Deutschlands, Oesterreichs und der Schweiz. Dr. L. Rabenhorst's Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Oesterreich und der Schweiz. Bd. 4, Abt. 3. Kummer, Leipzig.
Müller, C. 1857: Decas muscorum Oceani Pacifici. Botanische Zeitung (Berlin) 15: 777–782.
Sainsbury, G.O.K. 1945: New and critical species of New Zealand mosses. Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand 75: 169–186.
Smith, A.J.E. 2004: The Moss Flora of Britain and Ireland. Edition 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sykes, W. R. 1977: Kermadec Islands Flora: An annotated check list. New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research Bulletin 219: [1]–216.
Warnstorf, C. 1904–1906: Laubmoose. Kryptogamenflora der Mark Brandenburg un angrenzender Gebiete herausgegeben von dem Botanischen Verein der Provinz Brandenburg. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Leipzig.